Latest News
  JMS Speaks
  New JMS Works
  This Week's News
  JMS Comic Books
  B5 Cast Activities
  Legend: Rangers
  Jeremiah
  Reviews
  Trading
  Back-Issues
  Links
  B5 Clubs
  PhotoShop
  Toons

Conventions
  Attendance
  Con Calendar
  Photos
  Reports
  Rallys

Reader Participation
  Discussion
  Forums
  On-Line Chat
  Pen Pals
  Reader Directory
  Letters
  Art Gallery
  Message Board

Reference Section
  Events Calendar
  Reference
  B5 Magazine
  Universe Today
  Other Publications
  Zocalo Awards

THE ZOCALO DISCUSSION TOPIC

As an artist, I fully agree with JMS' attitude. We've already seen the result of inadequate funding with the disappointing quality of the first Lost Tales release. B5 and its fans deserve better.

"You get what you pay for." applies to business as well as consumer spending. Too many businesses fail to understand that.

Rick

I am a little torn on the subject. I absolutely agree with him that if the project is not going to have the investment a big project would, then we needn’t bother, as it would detract from the B5 Universe. But I am thinking of a full or miniseries. I do not feel there is an audience for a feature film. If B5 had actually been shown on TV like a normal series and one did not have to hunt it down each week, then perhaps it would have a shot. And maybe I do not understand the numbers involved, but I can’t see a feature being a real success. If this is the next step, I hope to be proven wrong.

And while I hang my head with embarrassment when thinking of The Legend of the Rangers, the special effects that I saw in The Lost Tales simply blew me away. I felt they were so good that it was like I was viewing the actual B5 station, after having watched CGI versions while the series ran. Of course, I saw that there were just as many opinions about the virtual sets. As many hated them as loved them. And to read that looking back JMS wouldn’t do them…well, it IS all subjective, but I agree with his assessment. I was not overly thrilled with the stories, and I must admit it was the novelty of new B5 that got me to spend the money. And while the Lost Tales may not have added a lot to B5 (which is the point JMS made), I still felt it hit the mark it was meant to: A look of high production given the relatively low cost (and hopefully good sales).

But I just get completely disgusted that shows like Stargate and Stargate: Atlantis go on and on and, in my opinion are the most uninspired of premises, which lead to an intolerable redundancy. All the while shows like Crusade, Farscape or Fire Fly (to name only a few) get cut off at the knees. It makes me ill.

On a side note, due to personal ickiness, I regret that I have not been on top of things here with the Zocalo. So, this may have been addressed previously. I am seriously saddened and disappointed to hear of the past Podcasts. They are exactly the kind of thing I would love to have access to. I have access to a fairly decent PC and a pretty good connection, but this world of Podcasts seems to still elude me. Am I going to the wrong places? I can’t imagine that it would only be exclusive to iPods. But, as far as I have experienced, these are not things I can sit at my PC and access. Such exciting projects, exclusive to Podcasts, have been mentioned often and I am completely in the dark – and I suspect, so are many others.

~SpongyTom

Hi Sandra,
Continuing to make Babylon 5 stories (backdoor pilots, direct-to-DVD releases, or even theatrical movies) detracts from one of the most fundamental aspects of the Babylon 5 epic. Babylon 5 was conceived of, and presented as, a single 5 year epic. As such, it is a single work of fiction. (On a side note – asking which episode or season of Babylon 5 is your favourite is akin to asking which chapter of the Lord of the Rings was your favourite. A single chapter can not stand independent of the context of the whole.)

Adding more Lost Tales or side-stories dilutes the over-arching arc of the series. It undermines the very foundation which made Babylon 5 extraordinary. This series was never able to stand as a set of stand-alone episodes, despite the assertion of JMS early on that each episode should be able to play on its own. By season 3 it was clear that this was something far more than episodic television. The episodes only made sense when viewed in their proper order. Everything related to the arc, even if it wasn’t directly driving the arc. To add side stories to the series only dilutes the impact of the designed five year span. Adding more movies is like adding chapters to any given masterpiece of literature. Perhaps we should add a few extra scenes to Hamlet to further delve into the lives of other characters.

It is this trap that the Star Wars epic has fallen into. I’ve heard talks about the new Clone Wars movie and proposed TV series that focus on characters which were given minimal screen time in other instalments. Yes, there is a certain degree of fun in this type of exploration, but it dampens the mystery, awe, and majesty of the original works.

In both cases there is a fully realized universe to tramp around in, looking into every nook and cranny until every avenue is explored. On the one hand, JMS has gone on to explore a wide variety of other universes, helping maintain a freshness to what he has to say. GL on the other hand, retreads old territory (revising the original Star Wars trilogy, releasing a feature film called the Clone Wars that appears to mimic the cartoon shorts originally shown on the Cartoon Network), and in the final analysis has lead to a stagnation of his story telling capability. I would hate to see a similar fate befall JMS and the Babylon 5 universe.

Fans will continue to spin their own tales in their imaginations. That is the prerogative of fans. It is how we keep B5 alive in our hearts.

The tough question is this, “How do we bring B5 to a new generation of fans without compromising the integrity of this masterpiece?”

Bob

I hate it but he is right. I would love more of Joes' B5 stories, but I want them to be as great as the the originals. Warner wants to make money on B5 fans without putting anything into it. We all deserve better, especially JMS

Peggy

Hi Sandy,
JMS, to me, has the right to steer the ship of B5 wherever he may want,, he should have the final say. That being said, OF Course, I would love any B5 in any way possible, but I am sick of B5 being the stepchild, never getting any respect due it, it kills the living daylights out of me. I would love a big budget deal like the schme(X) files or Stargate, or the Star Treks, especially of the telepath war. It would be wonderful, But, will B5 get that, so sad to say it is doubtful, because Babylon 5 is such a niche show, so over the heads of the brass, that they wouldn't agree. But, I hope a fluke will occur. B5 deserves that and so much more. But, I don't blame him for his decision and will always support him in these matters, though I miss B5 and everyone very much.

I fell in love with Enterprise (never liked any of the STS but the original), and that show gets no respect in the Star Trek world, but I love it anyway. But, Star Trek at least gets funding, something B5 never did. Can you imagine what Joe would have done with a couple million an episode, like he said once , he would have blown the doors of our TV sets.

I always fall in love with shows that don't last too long, B5 was the exception to the rule.

Take care and all the best,
Connie a B5 forever, and I will always love and miss Andreas, and Richard.

Hi Sandy:
Well, I just read this news right now, and probably my opinion will not be totally focused, but I think JMS must no depend so much from Warner be able to do, and, I think his opinion is right, in few words.

Kind regards,
Andrés

Dear Sandra,
I was disappointed with JMS's decision not to do more low-budget B5, but I wholeheartedly agree with his reasons. WB does NOT understand what they have, and will continually do "the bare minimum" to make a buck. JMS rightly says we all deserve better... With that said, there were so many "loose ends" JMS never formally addressed at the end of the show! What may be "complete" to him begs for answers from the fans--visually rather than in print.

B5 deserves better than WB's intent--and I commend JMS for standing up for his principles. B5 was a wonderful addition to the genre, and I am glad to have watched from the start. WB has already shortchanged the fans by their massacre of the episodes in DVD format and for not putting out a complete set in VHS (working both ends to the middle and stopping short of a complete set). So, as a fan, I have come to expect the mediocre from WB. Sad commentary for such a worthy Sci-Fi story.

Can we have a B5 funeral???

Sincerely,
Mary

Sandy,

I have to say I agree with Joe's decision. I'd rather have no B5, than bad B5, which is what we'd be getting if WB's bean counters have their way. I understand the need to cut costs, especially in today's economy, but Joe was right when he said WB doesn't understand what it has in the B5 franchise.

I'm hoping WB will take a page from Paramount's book, who also tried to produce the original Star Trek with a second TV series on the cheap, which thankfully was never realized (see Garfield and Judith Reeves-Stevens' excellent book Star Trek Phase II: The Lost Series). It wasn't until they fully committed to a major motion picture with major $$$ that the Star Trek franchise was truly re-born.

So, maybe after watching Paramount's big budget film relaunch of Star Trek next spring, WB will finally realize what we have known for over a decade (wow, still seems hard to believe so much time has passed!): Babylon 5 is simply, the finest Science Fiction ever produced for television.

Until then, we'll be waiting.....

Bill

Sandy,
JMS gave us B5, we enjoyed it, it's time to move on. Perhaps very soon there will be another 'upswing' in Sci-Fi movies, ala Star Wars, CE3K, ET, etc., which brought forth the Star Trek resergence in movies/tv, to do the same with B5 and Warner Brothers. One can only hope.

In the meantime, JMS goes forth with his life, as should we. That's not to say we should 'abandon' B5 completely, just place it on he 'second tier' of importance ::ducking::

Charles W.
Summerville, SC

Hi Sandy,
While we, the loyal fans of the show may or may not agree with Joe's decision to stop making Babylon 5 if the suits running WB don't stop tying his hands, we have to realize that it is his show and his decision to make. For the record, I back him in whatever decision he makes.

Charles

July 19, 2008
Topic #1:
Over the last several years, comic book themes have been BIG box office hits. Why do you think that is? Is it because comics, or graphic novels, make it easier to relate to a character? With the major success of THE DARK KNIGHT and SPIDER-MAN, what comic would you like to see next as a major film project?

Topic #2:
This one comes from Ranger Garybaldy:
If Warner Bros. would back a big budget BABYLON 5 film, but wanted other actors to play the major roles, would you be in favor of the project? This would be similar to the transition currently going on with STAR TREK as Christopher Pine takes on the role of James T. Kirk -- the story is set in the earlier days of the STAR TREK universe. What do you think?

From: Margaret
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 3:25 pm

I would love to see a new B5 movie but the original actors are 10 yers older and I am not sure it would appeal to a young audience. I know Battlestar Galactica was remade with new actors and it was very successful, but I could never watch it. I simply couldnt imagine a new and younger actor as Sheridan. If JMS can figure a way to keep the original actors in and bring in some others to take key parts without making it out of step with the past then I would be really excited. Otherwise, no!I would love to see a new B5 movie but the original actors are 10 yers older and I am not sure it would appeal to a young audience. I know Battlestar Galactica was remade with new actors and it was very successful, but I could never watch it. I simply couldnt imagine a new and younger actor as Sheridan. If JMS can figure a way to keep the original actors in and bring in some others to take key parts without making it out of step with the past then I would be really excited. Otherwise, no!

I don't know about this, it would be just great to actually SEE babylon 5 on TV. It seems to have disappeared totally off the radar.

I live in the UK and B5 was big over here. We have hundreds of channels available through satellite and freeview TV but not one of them shows any syndicated episodes of B5. Its like it never existed.

Over here you can catch several episodes from any of the star trek series every day, no wonder people have gotten tired of trek! Afeter the first 2 seasons of the original trek the rot had really set in, season 3 was appalling, TNG was an improvement but became dull and predictable, DS9 was a rip off of B5 at best, voyager was a non event and enterprise put the last nail in the coffin.

Empire movie/tv magazine recently ran a poll of their readers of the best 50 tv series ever shown on british tv, Babylon 5 came in about number 25 which is pretty amazing as it as been off our screens for so long.

back to the original question- no i wouldn't be happy with new actors taking over the roles from the original cast. I'm with JMS on this- i think its over really. The 5 year arc stands alone, Ok there are some unanswered questions but that's life and metaphysics and all that. Life is uncertainty.

B5 is my favourite show of all time, if a big budget film WAS made it would have to be pretty stupendous and extremely well done which is unlikely in big budget movies nowadays.

It seems there is an inverse square law relationship between the budget of a film and the perceived IQ of the potential audience ie bigger the budget the lower the IQ of the audience= big bucks, lots of action and a rubbish movie with a dumb subtext. You have to appeal to a lot of people to get your money back and make a killing so you dumb down your original franchise for the movies (as trek did)to try and gain mass appeal from people who don't normally watch the show anyway.

Sorry i'm just an old cynic. Alan

August 13, 2005
What do you really miss about BABYLON 5 the most? Is it the characters? The special effects? The quality of the show overall?

I miss the quality, and being blown away at yet another show greater then the last, and JMS's insight,, and writing, and G'Kar, and his sexyness and spirituality, the the G'Kar and Londo show,, and Sheridan and his dignity and grace, and B5 itself, and Mr. Garibladi's humor, and Marcus Cole's sweet, and fierce Ranger, and Dr. Franklin's humanity ( Rick biggs. we will always love and miss you) ,, need I say more..

And Lenniers loyalty, and Delenn's wisdom, and beauty,, Vir's honesty and the heady challenge it gave me week to week,,

Babylon 5 is still my passion and my refuge in my Alternate Reality,, and I mark 10 years next month since it found me,, or I found it. So, very, much, and nothing comes even close to it in my heart. Actually, the world of Harry Potter was the next thing I loved, my next enthusiasm after B5,, I call my room, the Potter Room. That captured me pretty well.

Although I really loved Farscape and am now enjoying Firefly,, and sorry Sandy, but Stargate just doesn't do it for me, and I am trying to watch it for Ben's sake, but, for me it isn't easy going, he is great, and so is Claudia,, though. I actually got into ER the non scifi show and am a big fan of it now, But, ah, B5, my heart forever, and my passion always, I miss it all. And have to take heart from it now, as my life is very tough,,

So take care, and thanks for asking,, all the best to you and your Zocalo forever,,

Peace and love,
Connie

In Babylon 5 itself I miss seeing the badgering between GKar and Londo. Some how I got a sick pleasure in seeing someone else being tormented. Quick witted cheeky remarks. I'm thinking mainly of the time they were stuck in the lift. "Confictions" in Season Three. Another way of looking at twisted souls. I much miss the character Kosh with his weird remarks that would stop any logical thinking person in their tracks. They are alone. They are a dying people. We should let them pass. (Who - the Narn or the Centauri? - Sinclair) Yes.

So much time has passed and memory of Babylon 5 is fading slightly. Think I'll have another look at the programmes.

Babylon 5 fan forever
Joanne aka G_Eagle5

I also miss the feeling of anticipation, of being hardly able to wait--from one week to the next--to find out what was going to happen. Real life provides little opportunity for true distraction--something that supplants whatever worries are most pressing. Babylon 5 offered just that sort of distraction--for an hour each week I was immersed in the life of the station, my own concerns put aside, my focus on a story so gripping it occupied my thoughts even after the episode ended.

So maybe it's way the story was written that I miss most--the humor, the depth, the continual glimpses into the minds and hearts of my favorite characters.

This could turn into a summer project!
With the start of a new SciFi Friday schedule, the SciFi Channel has included FIREFLY into the mix. It has 13 episodes to show -- and then they will probably re-run them, as they do the other SciFi Friday episodes of STARGATE, ATLANTIS and BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. Wouldn't it be wonderful if they included BABYLON 5 into the SciFi Friday mix? It would help with the repeats and bring back an old favorite -- and introduce some new sci-fi fans to a drama that we all know and love. What do you think?

Hello Sandy!
I am in the unusual position of no longer receiving cable TV, but I still have opinions. J
I own all of the Babylon 5 DVD’s so far released and I watch them all in order from time to time. I think ANYTHING that gets more public exposure and attention paid to Babylon 5, including CRUSADE, is good. There still could be people who would benefit from exposure to Babylon 5 and Crusade but haven’t yet fallen in love with the storylines and characters.

Another reason for resurrecting re-runs of Babylon 5 and Crusade on TV could possibly be positive attention from anyone in a position to make a sincere offer to JMS to write additional material in any format. I would prefer TV of movie, but even good books would be wonderful!

I’ve said it before and I will continue to say Crusade was murdered by short sighted executives (suits) at TNT who should forever hang their heads in shame!

Please encourage SciFi to include the entire Babylon 5, Crusade, and all related TV movies in the Friday night schedule.

Michael (Mike)

Hi Sandy:
About your question if Sci-Fi Channel can reruns of B5, I'd say that it would be wonderful. Although I don't see Sci-Fi Channel in my country, is and will be my opinion that B5 still today, (after all this years and new series), one of the series with most realism. I mean is one of the most possible and close future than I've seen.

Andrés.

I would LOVE to see the Sci-Fi Channel include reruns of Babylon 5 on their Friday night lineup! At least then, there'd be something to keep me awake...

Believe me, I've tried really hard to get interested in the new shows that have started airing recently, but none of them seem to do much for me anymore. A friend of mine is a big fan of Firefly and really urged me to watch it when they started showing it again last week. I only made it about twenty minutes before I had fallen asleep! (Westerns have never done a thing for me.) The main reason I don't enjoy either Stargate series anymore is because they both have characters that really rub me the wrong way. I suppose Rodney and Vala are supposed to be "charming" with their abrasive personalities, but they just make me want to turn the TV off... And I have *never* understood the appeal of the new Battlestar Galactica either. Just look at the actors' faces on those little promos between commercials. That says it all for me...

Let's start a letter-writing campaign to get B5 shown again! Since it last aired on Sci-Fi, I guess they still own the rights to it. Just think how it would blow all these other shows out of the water! Long live B5, the best show ever on TV! ;-)

Bill/Kosh

Sandra,
Overall, I was disappointed in all of the episodes that premiered last Friday. I had very high expectations and unfortunately there wasn't one show at the end where I said to myself, "yeah, this was worth the wait and this episode kicked ass!!". I think that Battlestar Gallactica (BG) tried to do too much and accomplished little. In other words, they were trying to introduce or tie up plots on two separate planets, 3 plots on BG, and 1 in Gaius' mind. I am not adverse to complex plots but this episode was razor thin on payoffs and left you wanting something better instead of wanting more period... This episode was more like a series finale than a Season 2 premiere. No doubt, I will still watch every episode this season unless there are too many like this one. Please give us at least one payoff!! On a scale of 1-10 where 10 is best this was a 5.

Regarding SG Atlantis, I was a little happier with this although this plotline was also thin for a three episode arc. They should have done it in 2 eps. Also, without spoiling this for those who have not seen this yet, the ending trick (very cute) to get rid of the Wraith was a bit of a stretch. Although, I thought that having an Asgard on the Dedalus as a stodgy weapons officer was a good touch and I could see that character being used like a secret weapon similar to Galen from Crusade and Lyta in B5. A future The Zocolo Today discussion topic could be the puzzler: "What do you get when a Wraith feeds on an Asgard?". Or even better, why not use a Wraith to feed on Anubus (SG-1) so that we can bury that plotline for good. I rate this episode a 7.

Last but not best is my favorite show of all three, SG-1. The Stargate SG-1 premiere was really bad and I just don't have the heart to write what I really think. This show was a 2. The only reason I can see to continue with SG-1 is to help with Atlantis until they can survive on their own without plot assistance from the parent show. I will commit to watching at least 3 more episodes and if it doesn't improve I will not record or watch this show so as not to sully the memory of the first 7 excellent (not all perfect) seasons.

In summary, now that my expectations have been lowered, I should get more satisfaction out of the upcoming episodes which I hope will be as good as some of last season's especially in BG and Atlantis. Thank the gods they are going to play the Firefly series on Friday nights to shore up the lineup!

Ranger Gary

Hi Sandy,
I was a big fan of Stargate SG1. I will have to wait for a few more of the new episodes with the new cast before I decide if I still am a fan. To me, Richard Dean Anderson was the heart and soul of the show. It was his relationship with each of the other cast members, that made the show so good. I just don't know how it will be without him. Still, I will give the new show a chance.

Stargate Atlantis, I think, will benefit from the addition of the new cast members there. Battlestar Galactica is a great show and looks to be getting better all the time. It was certainly worth the wait. The jury is still out on the other two. Time will tell.

Thanks,

I think the SciFi Channel has a good thing going with SciFi Friday -- a strong line-up of programs along a single theme. Do you think this would work with other networks? Should NBC or ABC move shows around so that they are more closely grouped by genre?

Question #1:
Remakes of old movies seem to be the thing these days. If you had a choice of which old movie you could have remade or re-imagined, which one would you choose? Would it be something like CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON, THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, THE INVISIBLE MAN, FORBIDDEN PLANET? While you are daydreaming, who would you choose to star in the production?

Hello Sandra,
Enterprise can be summed up in two words in my opinion:

"Rick Berman." I thought the show had potential, but he simply doesn't have the same creative spark that others have. I think the opening title music was horrible. I watched the show, with the sound OFF at the opening credits. The show was also poorly distributed. In Columbus, Ohio (not quite the "cowtown" it used to be) no local carrier broadcast the show. The nearest station to carry it was in a town out of TV reception range.

I think "The Day the Earth Stood Still" would be a great film to re-make...on condition that somebody really great pulls it off.

And I still regret TNT's arrogance in the murder of Crusade. If by any chance Crusade gets a new life, I sincerely hope as many of the original cast as possible would be used. Peter Woodward as Galen is not a negotiable issue for me. He IS Galen. If he doesn't want the part the name and character should be changed completely.

Hi Sandra,
Well, here's my two cents. The old movie I want to see remade is "When Worlds Collide." With today's special effects capability, they could present a very realistic sequence (i.e. accurate as far as meteorology, geology, etc.) of the Earth being ripped apart by the gravitational forces of the approaching rogue planet, and then finally coming into collision with it. As a person with a background in astronomy and geology, I've always wanted to see this in a film -- not just a big explosion that's over in a couple of seconds. A planet breakup would take "hours" to occur -- OK, they could condense that into "minutes" for the sake of the film. But something the size and mass of the Earth jusn't just disappear in a big sparklling explosion -- there would be enormous chunks of crustal rock, splashes of liquid magma cooling in the freezing cold of space, whole pieces of continents spinning and crashing into each other -- and not only from the Earth but from the invading planetary body as well. It would be glorious -- the ultimate "end-of-the-world" scenario.

Also, apart from the penultimate special effects, the benefit to doing a remake of "When Worlds Collide" is to realistically examine just what it would take with today's technology to try and save a remnant of humanity as well as our culture and civilization by transporting them to another world on short notice (only a year or two) and the interpersonal stories of those involved in making the decisions. In short, I would want to see it done as a serious science fiction treatment and not some pyrotechnic-laden macho-action disaster flick -- I would wish for Steven Spielberg material, not Michael Bay schlock....

TimK

The old movie that I've always wanted to see remade is "Fantastic Voyage" -- the 1966 sci-fi thriller about a medical team who board a submarine and are then miniaturized and injected into a man's bloodstream to perform micro-surgery to save his life. With all the tremendous advances that have been made in medicine in the past 40 years, I'm sure it could be made much more realistic now than it was back then. (I have to shudder when I think about that plastic toy submarine dangling on "invisible" strings in front of those obviously fabric curtains hanging in the background!) Just think what they could do nowadays with CGI to simulate the inside of the human brain or heart, and a tiny submarine being swept along with billions of red blood cells rushing through an artery at breakneck speeds...

I saw a show on public TV recently about these amazing breakthroughs they've been making in computerized medical imagery, and it reminded me how no one has ever remade that movie, other than a recent TV commercial where a surgeon is daydreaming he's part of the miniaturized team. The original movie was pretty cheesy like all the 60's sci-fi stuff (remember the lightweight foam boulders in the original Star Trek?!), but the movie's basic premise and storyline were very thoughtful and dramatic. I wouldn't really care who starred in it as long as they were good actors, and in my opinion, they could omit all the blatantly sexist scenes they had in the 60's version, like where Raquel Welch was being attacked by antibodies clinging all over her skintight jumpsuit and several men's hands were groping her all over trying to remove them before she suffocated!

Sandy,

In response to your question as to why Enterprise was cancelled I offer the following theory: Star Trek "fans" -- people who consider themselves to be the authorities on all things Trek -- criticized the first two years of Enterprise. An unpopular theme song, darker than usual visuals, and poor writing were indeed hallmarks of the new show. Sadly, rather than realize that each of the franchise shows (other than the Original Series) took a couple of years to settle in and begin making at-times terrific television, the self-appointed fans/guardians of "Gene's Vision" roundly blasted the show and refused to watch. And understandably so.

However, when Enterprise finally found its true voice -- with the Xindi storyline -- these self-same viewers steadfastly refused to come back.

We must understand that Star Trek has been a niche show for some time. We have to remember that the later episodes of DS9 as well as the entire runs of Voyager and Enterprise played to considerably smaller audiences than TNG's epic run or DS9's first few seasons. And, in point of fact, not a single Star Trek franchise tv series has EVER been lovingly embraced in its first two seasons. TNG's quality for the first year was questionable, and DS9 wasn't true Trek 'cause they station never went anywhere. But the niche fans stood by them both and the rest is tv history.

These fans, the desired target audience in the new world of demographics, stayed away from Enterprise's thrid and fourth seasons in droves.

I have been a fan of Star Trek since the first episode in 1966, over which this (at the time) five year old boy discovered the universe on the bridge of the USS Enterprise. I attended conventions in the early 1970's when we were all still considered odd little cultists who needed to "get a life". I was there the first time Kirk encountered the Doomsday Machine, and was saddened as he watched Edith Keeler die. I bought pieces of film, cut from a reel of TOS, from a company called Lincoln Enterprises -- and if you recognize the name you can smile knowing you're a true fan. I was among those thrilled and disappointed in the first theatrical film. Wasn't sure if I liked TNG for the first two years, and never really got swept into DS9 but watched it anyway. The same with Voyager, and the first two seasons of Enterprise.

And I saw, especially in the last year of Enterprise, sparks of life that took me back all those many years to my first encounters with Kirk, Spock and Dr. McCoy. The actors were having fun. The stories were well-written, challenging and controversial. The program was achieving status as the equal of TOS's first season, and the best of TNG or DS9. Manny Coto had it, he had found the key. From a spark of life he was beginning to breathe some fire into the show.

Sadly, the very fans who consider themselves all things Trek, ignored him. Criticized the show. "I don't watch it anymore, it's terrible", without even looking in to see if it was still true. They abandoned the show in the second season and never looked back except to lob mud and stones at Berman and Company -- who had -- the "fans" said -- destroyed their child, their show. They ignored the critics and the others who stilled watched, matter-of-factly dismissing the show.

Rather than rally to the fire and rejoice, they turned their backs and put it out.

Hi Sandy:
Answering your last question, I think the answer, at least for me, is some of both possibilities, poor writing and fatigue. A rest (not too much) will be good, and something more original for the next time.

Andrès.

Your posed question basically answered the question but there is plenty still to say about Enterprise (by the way I like these kind of discussion topics). The worst thing besides the writing, producing and theme song was the casting. A good cast can help make a mediocre written & produced TV show somewhat entertaining. Several examples could be Robin Williams in Mork & Mindy and the cast of SG1 which has shined through average scripts the last 2-4 seasons (Seasons 1-5 had very good scripts for the most part). So, back to enterprise. The main culprit was lame Captain Archer/Scott Bakula who should stick to Broadway Musicals and stop polluting sci-fi. He was neither compelling nor believable as Capt and I found myself frequently begging for his demise only to be disappointed on his survival. How Rick Berman & Co came to this casting decision based on Bakula's past Quantum Leap lameness is a puzzle to me. Dean Stockwell and the voice of "Ziggy" (the computer time machine thing) overshadowed Bakula in every "Leap" episode.

On to T'Pol/Jo Blalock. Her casting was almost as much as an insult to male sci-fiers as 7 of 9 was from Voyager. Her boring delivery and demeanor "coupled" with out-of-place plastic surgery was supposed to suck in the male viewers without a care for quality or acting. Obviously, it didn't work. How can a beautiful model with about 15 minutes of prior TV acting experience help carry a lame show? I am sorry, this distraction from the show itself did not fool the real Trek fans. Just because a vulcan is supposed to lack emotion does not mean some personality should not be present! Spock at least had believable sarcasm and conviction. Rick Berman and co. should shame himself! I did not care enough about Trip/Connor Trineer in Enterprise them or now to expand on his merits or lack of.

In summary, Rick Berman got it all wrong in Enterprise especially in the casting. At the end he added fuel to the pyre flame by introducing past Trek legends such as Data, Riker, Q, Troi etc. to spice up the cast and save the show from cancellation. The producers of SG1 are going down an opposite rocky road by adding Ben Browder to an already excellent cast. Browder's pretty face and lack of acting ability will no doubt bury "the" Stargate. Berman's casting tricks couldn't work because the ship was already broken. And, as Einstein used to say "the mind who broke something is not capable of fixing it" (paraphrased). Let JM Stracsinski (B5/Crusade) have a shot at the next Trek or don't Trek again in my lifetime!! I guarantee that JMS won't let a network/studio force him to cast losers again as he had to do with Showtime's "Jeremiah" (zero dimensional Luke Perry).

Ranger Gary
PS. Please please don't waste $ on Enterprise DVDs! Good DVD sales will only validate Rick Berman and keep the Trek franchise in the "down below" of TV Land.

Sandra, here are my thought on this topic:
Man, there are so many fingers pointing on this one, poor writing and series fatigue included. There are many in the "fan community" who blame executive producers Brannon Braga and Rick Berman. I think they're right. Where else would you lay the blame for the series failure but at the feet of those charged with maintaining the franchise's vitality?

For many fans, the animosity for Braga and Berman began to develop among fans when B & B bounced Ronald D. Moore from Deep Space Nine and Voyager. Many fans viewed Moore as the imaginative one, the more forward looking of the trio. Both those series suffered in quality (a subjective judgment, sure, but shared by many) after Moore's departure. Moore has shown his quality in his revival of Battlestar Galactica, certainly, but also, more quietly, in his abandonment of the Dragonriders of Pern TV Series when faced by creative bankruptcy on the part of the network.

B & B have, quite simply, shown no creativity or imagination in their shepherding of the Star Trek Franchise since Moore's departure. Some have noted a lack of creativity even earlier, suggesting B & B adapted JMS's B5 pitch into Deep Space Nine (unproven).

The Star Trek franchise was a great starship cruising along under its own massive momentum. Under the direction of B & B that momentum dissipated and the franchise slowly ground to a halt, as they drove it into the ground through their arrogance and lack of creativity. And their arrogance drove truly creative people like Moore away from the franchise. Other strong personalities seemed to threaten B & B. It's the big dog syndrome, where you don't dare to bring in new strong talent because you're afraid of being eclipsed yourself.

And so we got rehash, and not done well. B & B thought the Xindi arc was a breakthrough. It was poorly imagined trek rehash. So were Insurrection and Nemesis. Interestingly, in Enterprise's last year, Manny Coto and the new writers managed to find freshness for the series by delving into the actual "past" of the Trek universe...

Clearly, it's not the Trek continuity or the Trek universe that people are tired of. It's bad writing, poorly told stories, and boring plot conventions used time and time again by B & B that killed the franchise.

Thanks for the opportunity to spout, Sandra.

The audience lost interest in Enterprise for many reasons. First, I think people knew what was to come. The Xindi threat was toothless because we knew Kirk and Picard were in the future. A corollary to this is that Enterprise trashed the TOS books that kept the franchise alive. In particular, when whey throw away/ignore/invalidate excellent novels like Spock's World they offend the hardcore base for no good reason.

Second, Star Trek has what seems to be a hardened rule that nothing changes during a series. In TOS, Klingons were enemies. In TNG, Klingons were friends. When they weren't, there was a rush to make them friends again. Nowhere in ST have we seen a major character undergo a conversion like G'Kar or a major change of philosophy and motivation like Lyta.

Third, because of the above the writers were handcuffed with what stories they could tell. All episodes had to leave the 'STUniverse' in the same position that it found it. And the writers/creators wouldn't allow the characters to grow in any significant ways. Hoshi becoming accustomed to space flight hardly qualifies as a major (or interesting) character development.

So all in all, the ST franchise has become stale and as it has been the standard-bearer for SF TV has diminished SF along the way. New shows like Farscape, Firefly, and Battlestar Galactica make ST look one dimensional. The shame of this is that Farscape and Firefly didn't last longer.

In the ST universe the better stories came from the 'A Time to...' series than Enterprise. That's a sad commentary.

George Moore
Ashburn, VA

Sandy,
Thanks for the great topic! There are many reasons why "Enterprise" failed, but the main reasons were:
Berman and Braga's refusal to use outside writers until it was too late. As Captain Average stated, Berman and Braga's egos virtually destroyed this show early on. I believe this was the first Trek not to solicit scripts from outside writers, and boy, did it show from the pathetic scripts!

Talking down to the audience. I believe one of the cardinal rules in writing is not to insult your audience. You don't "dumb down" a script. Your audience is knowledgeable, and will seek out the level you're writing at. How many times did we have appalling writing that made us wince?!

I won't even get into the pathetic German/Alien business here, I just cringed every time Berman/Braga had to sledgehammer home a point. Archer: "Maybe someday we'll have a Prime Directive to guide us." Duh! This kind of cutesy, nudge, nudge writing just made the show even more despised.

Refusing to acknowledge there was a problem. Kind of like the captain of the Titanic, refusing to acknowledge the problem until it was way too late. By bringing on the new runner for season 4, the powers that be did acknowledge the problem, but the damage was already done, and the good ship Enterprise was already lost. Too bad, really, because the final season's scripts were among the best. Is it a surprise that several quality Trek writers (ie: Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens among them) were brought in after Berman/Braga's departure? Again, too little, too late, as most fans had long since fled for the lifeboats.

Total disregard/contempt for what had gone before. I must admit: when the show first started, (including the pilot), I was intrigued by the premise that this Trek would not be beholden to what had gone before (or chronologically; after). The pilot did have a certain unfinished, primitive, crunchy feel to it, and the fact that the crew constantly would meet advanced races, not all of them friendly, and the Enterprise was constantly getting the crap knocked out it on a weekly basis. This I could buy. We're not going to be the biggest kid in the playground, we don't have the biggest and best toys, and there's no Federation to get our backs. This slowly eroded though into the above mentioned "cutesy" scripts, and to total disregard for known Trek canon. Having this crew have a run-in with the Romulans when it was already known Kirk was the first Enterprise captain to encounter them. So somebody here is a liar, and my guess is it wasn't Gene Roddenberry!

The final straw as mentioned, was that Berman/Braga's egos had to have the last laugh, the last "flip 'em the bird" to the fans in the series finale. By killing off Trip, and cheapening the story as a Next Generation holodeck simulation?! That is the absolute worst show of contempt for a fan base I have ever witnessed!

If the Star Trek franchise is to have life, it needs new blood. JMS, Bryan Singer, any quality writer/director/producer would be a step in the right direction. If Berman and Braga are allowed anywhere near the Trek franchise it will continue to decay from the top down.

In my area (No. Calif) more than half the time the series was pre-empted by sports, plus sometimes it was on at 8pm sometimes at 9, sometimes not at all. And didn't they switch the night it was on at some point?

It was very difficult to follow episodes in sequence unless one was glued to the station 24-7. I don't think the network ever gave the series the support and structure that it needed.

Kamil

As for the Discussion topics, don't have much to say about the last two,, as I was not a watcher of " Enterprise",, I never liked any of the other Treks except the first and Classic and also, am not presently following any SF TV shows. I am watching the program, " E.'R." and have become a big fan of that in the last several months, and am catching up on the show in daytime reruns. And it is in "E.R." that I have seen my life several times, and it is speaking to me more then most shows these days. I was sad that Noah Wyle left, and he is wonderful. But 11 years is a lot, they work really hard on that show. I also watch " Queer as Folk" and "Six Feet Under", they are in their last seasons too.

I will start watching " Stargate" next season out of loyalty to Ben Browder, who I loved in Farscape,, he is great,, so I will see if I can get into it then.

You did ask about what scenes from B5 stood out to me,, I would say first the scene in the Council Chamber, when Londo is demanding that G' Kar leave after the fall of Narn, and the dignity and courage that G'Kar showed when he answered him defiantly and said that " Though it take a thousand years, we will be free". That is what made me fall in love with him right there. Then,, when Kosh left his encounter suit and saved Sheridan,, that was so outstanding,, just blew me away..The whole of " Severed Dreams" that episode showed me how much I loved the station and this show. There are so very many incredible scenes, of glory and pain, that were contained in B5, such as in Sleeping in Light, when Sheridan and Delenn said their goodbyes for the last time, just broke me open and then when B5 was well, you know, it just shattered me as I have always felt that B5 was my home in the alternate universe of my soul.

You also asked about possessions,, and my most precious was the " SIL" special shirt, that I sent to JMS after the only two times I wore it, at my last meeting of the informal B5 group I had for 2 years, and at the first airing of " Sleeping in Light" and I asked him to write what he wished, and when I got it back, Christmas eve of 1998, he wrote, " To Connie,, True Keeper of the Flame, With Thanks, J. Michael Straczynski", and when I saw it I cried. That is my online title. I would also say that I so appreciate my crew jacket with Bruce Boxleitners signature within it, and also most anything that Andreas Katsulas ever autographed. As well, my G'Kar bust, which I finally got for a price I could afford. I have some great memories too, and the whole of the Babylon 5 experience was a great one and will never be repeated for me.

So, those are some observations of mine. I hope you can get a hold of the book and all as well, and I will always love B5 and it is still my passion after almost 10 years. It was a totally unique experience, and thanks for keeping the faith, and your site. Best wishes too all.

Peace,,
Faith manages
Connie -- The Flamekeeper

Enterprise" died because, after an exceptionally good first season, creators Rick Berman and Brannon Braga [hereinafter referred to as "Bermaga"] systematically deconstructed every single thing they had done right in season one [see: Jason Katims/'Roswell'].

Faced with huge ratings losses, they regroupd and made a wee bit of a comeback with the season long Xindi arc - but by extending the Temporal Cold War two years longer than it really should have run, they continued to lose fans [both admitted in interviews that they loved the Temporal Cold War because it offered an "instant reset button" - which was precisely the reasons fans hated it, showing that Bermaga had completely lost touch with the Trekkers and Trekkies out there].

Finally, Bermaga ended season three with "ALIEN FRELLING NAZIS!!!!" Even I planned on skipping Season 4. C'mon, guys! "ALIEN FRELLING NAZIS????" That is such a tired, overworked, pitiful cliche´ of an idea that it essentially killed the series.

Even stepping back and making Manny Coto ['Odyssey 5'] the showrunner for season 4 wasn't enough to entice fans back to the series - which was really too bad. Coto took the sow's ear with which Bermaga had saddled him and turned it, if not into a silk purse, at least a darned nice leather one [Coto, as it happens, was the *only* reason I came back for season 4].

He took the "ALIEN FRELLING NAZIS!!!" cliffhanger and managed to escape embarrassing the show further by making it actually work out in a way that led into a season that was more pure Trek than anything since season 1.

His work on season 4 showed that the franchise wasn't fatigued at all Season 4 was the single most creative and entertaining season of Trek since the middle seasons of 'NextGen' - it was the total loss of anything resembling a connection to reality on the part of Bermaga that did the show in.

As further proof, Bermaga wouldn't even let 'Enterprise's' showrunner write the finale - even after he'd overseen the show's best season. Instead, they stepped in, wrote a second- season-Next-Generation episode, killed off one of the show's most loved characters, Trip [after making sure they destroyed the fans' hopes that his relationship with T'Pol - that was clearly rebuilt by Coto, culminating in a dandy penultimate episode, would never happen], and then, by writing the finale from the POV of Riker and Troi [and set six years after the previous episode], ensured that the events of the ep were so distanced from the fans that they could hardly react properly to the allegedly emotional "Valentine for the fans" that Bermaga had crafted! [Not that I'm bitter, you understand...]

If there is a future Trek TV series, Manny Coto should be offered the opportunity to pitch ideas for it. Bermaga should be refused entry onto the Paramount lot.

And that's the name of *that* tune!

Captain Average
The Superhero, Not Looking to Lynch Bermaga - That Would Be Wrong...

I think there are several reasons why Enterprise got cancelled. The most obvious of course were the oversaturation factor and its poor writing. Not everyone in the world is a hardcore Star Trek addict, so it takes a really good series to keep drawing in on a weekly basis all the people who only watch casually. To be honest, I was never too crazy about the idea of a "prequel" series set before the original series, but Rick Berman seemed hell-bent on that idea for several years and finally got his wish after plans for that type of movie fell through. It just didn't make much sense to me since Star Trek has always been about the future and looking forward, rather than backwards. I was intrigued though when they promised us lots of crossover with the original series to show us how things had gotten to the point that we'd seen with Kirk and Spock...

Instead, we got everything *else* under the sun, including a whole entire season wasted on that ridiculous Xindi plotline, which frankly was pretty boring since you *knew* in the end they *would* be saving Earth simply because it had always existed all through "future history" ... Like most people, I stopped watching the series until they finally *did* start bridging the gap with TOS (four years too late...) By then,so many fans had already jumped ship, it was too late to keep the ship from sinking and the whole franchise crashed and burned just like whenever they'd let Deanna Troi drive...! Even Rick Berman himself openly admits that they simply went to the well too often and strangled the goose that laid the golden egg. From what I've read here on the news page, it sounds like some people *still* don't know when to quit though since he's planning on beating that dead horse even more with a new movie featuring all new characters we've never even *heard* of before... Huh?!?!

{*sigh*} I really miss Gene Roddenberry... :-(

I feel it is simply the case of ‘doing Star Trek Enterprise for the sake of having a Star Trek show on the air. Simply because it is Star Trek.’ Not because there are any imaginative ideas. If anything, in my opinion they painted themselves into a corner by backdating it the way they did. It could have been done well…But I feel it was more of a challenge than those involved could handle properly.

I always thought the idea of an anthology show would have been interesting. Episodes that could have believable resolutions in 40 minutes (and not just a default resolution in the final 5 minutes as in most Next Gen episodes (i.e. the crew not having a clue and then it gets resolved for them in many cases). But I digress…Perhaps my idea for a Star Trek anthology series might not have anything more than a novel appeal. But I think it opens up the genre to a wide-range of story ideas. You can have it in any known, and some new, time lines (and even the Mirror universe (without seeming gratuitous). It all has a base in story, first and foremost. And just like the Sci Fi anthology shows such as The Twilight Zone and Outer Limits, guest stars would pull viewers as well as the universe they are now in. The Federation has many resources. Star Fleet is just a part. Endless story ideas…. I see it as a way to break from formula by returning to a type of formula. The way we handle it today could be so much fun. And I certainly get a charge at the thought of those classic ships and such with modern technology (and not just the teasers we got from the other shows).

I’m sorry, what was the question Sue..?

t.

I believe series fatigue had more to do with the cancellation of Star Trek:Enterprise than anything else. The franchise started going downhill with Voyager and after Voyager just needed a rest rather than another series. altho it's possible that a very strong series, well written and cast, might have brought new life. Instead, we got Enterprise. The writing was not particularly good in either Voyager or Enterprise, and Enterprise suffered from the additional pains of distorted Star Trek history and poor acting. Enterprise often seemed to be written and acted by people who didn't know anything about Star Trek. Across the board, too many plot lines were being repeated not only in Enterprise but also in feature films. Star Trek: Nemesis, for example, was a combination ripoff of The Wrath of Khan and Generations -- kill off and resurrect a major character, and trash the ship.

This is not to say that Star Trek is dead -- we all know that nobody and nothing ever dies in Star Trek. Let it alone for a few years and the best parts of it may well be rediscovered and enjoyed by a whole new generation of viewers. Meanwhile, those of us who have always been addicted to the best of Star Trek can enjoy it on our DVDs.

Ranger Roja Grande de los Gatos

Sandy,
For your discussion of season/series finales, I'd like to comment on watching the final episode of "Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda" which, unlike "Enterprise," was on a 5-year plan (like B5?).

The producers of Andromeda were smart enough to make "The Heart of the Journey" a two-part episode & not show it in one 2-hour block. It made for a better cliffhanger. Seeing the destruction of Earth (Seamus Harper's homeworld) was a bit shocking but made me realize that the Abyss had no feelings save that of destruction and killing Dylan Hunt, the last of the Paradine.

The scene in which Harper confides in Dylan, while sitting in one of Andromeda's corridors, about his loss was very moving and showed (to me) how differently both men handled the subject, as well as how much they were both alike.

Of course, the battle scenes as Andromeda faced the Nietzschean fleet were well played out; punctuated by Matthew McCauley's score. And the final showdown between Andromeda & the Abyss at the Route of Ages were, to me, the most exciting. And I did cheer as Tarn Vedra, Dylan's homeworld, was reunited with the Known Worlds as High Guard ships entered the area.

The most memorable scenes of all were of Dylan alone on Command, contemplating everything that had happened and that, after 308 years (as he says), he was finally home.

As someone who just started watching Andromeda last year, this episode was worth the effort to watch. Thanks to everyone involved.

Anne

Hi Sandy:
About the question of this week. just I'm watching Enterprise, and sometimes Galactica B.A.

I'm still watching the re-aired episodes of the season 3 of ST. I wan´t to see the downloaded (from internet) episodes of season 4 and finale. When I watch this I'll make comments.

Really no too much for comments. Like you say, almost all the seasons finished...

Previous D.T.
Like you know, the best momentos for me in conventions was in FedCon 8 at Germany in 2000, when I met J.D. and our very remembered R. Biggs, and one year later in New Jersey, when I met Mira Furlan in The Chiller Theatre Con. I keep very good remembrances (and photos) from each of that events. I hope to can repeat it in the near future.

Regards,
Andrés.

Hi Sandra,

Longtime reader, first time writer. Thanks a LOT for all of the effort you put in keeping us B5 and sci-fi fans informed of what's happening out in the world. Your efforts are very much appreciated!

Anyway, as to the enders. I DVR'ed CSI and just watched it last night. I must say, that was one of, if not the most emotional episodes I've seen of the series. I was in tears in empathy, sympathy, sadness, and relief during several portions of the show. Being claustrophobic myself, as well as HATING being bitten by red ants, Nick's experience really hit home and George Eads did a fantastic job of playing the part. That being said, the whole episode felt different, not like a typical show. The main characters seemed to stand around a lot and not be their normal selves. I think that all came from the Quentin Tarantino effect. The script he wrote could have been used as a standalone vehicle and it just so happened that the CSI crew was playing the roles; however, those roles could have been played almost to the same effect by other good actors in a two hour movie. The emotional connection between them all did add considerably to the experience though, as well as the way certain circumstances (Katherine with the money, Grissom with the spider) fit to recurring themes within the show. All in all, it was a very different CSI, and made a great season ender, but I don't think I could handle such emotional roller coasters on a weekly basis.

As for Enterprise, I was emotional for that too, but for a different reason... this show ended too soon! I'll agree with most folks that years 1 - 3 were pretty disappointing, mainly because the show wasn't doing what it could have and should have done: explore the beginnings of the Federation and the reason the things in TOS were the way they were. But this year was a huge exception. They brought in the good writers, the folks who are able to write the ST books that made you hear the voices of Kirk, Spock, Picard, et al, and see the ST universe when you read them, and it paid off. IMHO, this year had the best episodes of the series by far, from the exploration of Vulcan, to the Augments (and the explanation of the lack of Klingon ridges... LOL), to Babel... exploring and touching on elements of the existing ST universe and canon, somes brilliantly. So when I heard the series was being cancelled after four seasons (what should have happened to Voyager), I was very disappointed, as this season was almost like a different show. But the episode itself did not disappoint. I felt the inclusion of Riker and Troi using that particular time period as guidance was a good premise and the show itself was pretty good as well, but I was disappointed in Trip dying. Frankly, I didn't care for the character in the early seasons, but came to like him more and more, especially this season as they explored the relationship between he and T'Pol (who was also better this year). While he went out in an heroic way, it felt kind of forced. And now, any future movies or other vehicles have a limited timeframe to use if that character is to be included. All in all, pretty good series ender for a series that ended too early. Berman and Braga should have used writers like Manny Coto and Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens far earlier in the series and maybe we could have watched the show explore the last six years of it's mission, instead of just reading books about it. Since the intro of ST:TNG, I've always looked forward to a new ST episode every week and I know I will miss it.

Thanks for the opportunity,
Wipster

'Charmsville'... erm... 'Smarmsville... make that 'Smallville' was hokey, poorly written and the perfect capper to a dismally lacklustre season. The events of the season require a Big Red Reset Button if it's ever going to dovetail with canon, but that's not the biggest problem - a complete and total lack of quality [though the last scene of Clark, throwing the collected artifact thingy was cool if only because it echoed the beginning of the construction of the Fortress of Solitude in 'superman: The Motion Picture.'

'Enterprise' aired the real finale immediately preceding the colossal blunder that was Bermaga's 'These Are the Voyages...' 'Terra Prime' may not have been as tightly plotted, but it was true to the spirit of Trek; treated the characters and their relationships with the respect they were due; and referenced The Original Series in a way that fit.

'These Are The Voyages...' was a second-season TNG ep that masqueraded as an 'enterprise' ep. It was totally disrespectful of the 'Enterprise' characters and their relationships - reducing them to mere reference points along the path through Cmdr Riker's moral dilemma. Everything that happened on the NX-01 was too far removed from any kind of immediacy since they were events that happened both two hundred years ago [in terms of Riker and Troi], or six years in the future [in terms of the 'Enterprise' series and its fans.

This was a Valentine to Bermaga - *not* the show's fans - it was an ill-thought-out ego trip that robbed fourth season showrunner, Manny Coto, of the right to finish what he started - a revamping of the series that brought the joy of the original series back to us.

Unfortunately, one of machines ate the 'CSI' finale, so I guess I'll have 'til the DVD release of the season set to find out if it worked or not...

Captain Average
The Superhero, Hoping 'Desperate Housewives,' 'Lost' & 'Alias' Wash The Bad Taste Out Of His Mouth...

My most cherished piece of B5 memorabilia would definitely have to be my own homemade Vorlon encounter suit. (Photos available through my Yahoo profile.) It took me about four years, off and on, to finally finish making it, and it won me lots of awards in a Masquerade contest at a convention a few years ago. I'm planning on reprising it at another convention this summer where Jeffrey Willerth and Pat Tallman will be in attendance, but I'll be taking it one step further this time by actually *emerging* from it on stage during the show this time...

"As so it begins...!" ;-)

Bill
ambkosh8465@yahoo.com

While there are many, many impactful scenes in the series (Kosh's unveiling, Delenn's agony at the hands of the inquisitor, the first good look at a Shadow ship), the one that never fails to move me is from SiL (which had more than its share of moments...).

after John is "gone", Delenn rolls over to wrap her arms around him - and he's not there, so she clutches his pillow. Ranks right up there with her watching the sun rise...

hmmm... got me thinking that one...

Treasured Memory... Watching Andreas Katsulas and Peter Jurasik perform their famous 'love scene' at the biggest B5 convention ever in Blackpool, England. Andreas bringing out, and climbing, a 15ft ladder so that he would avoid being kissed by Peter for the 2nd time that weekend :)

Treasured Object... while I have many signed photos and cards, it's perhaps the card that I designed for the B5 CCG - my own little bit of B5 'history' :)

My most precious Babylon 5 momentoes are actually my memories of the special times I've had with friends and fellow fans at various conventions over the years, with VORcon and Dragoncon 2000 being my favorite memories. At both of these conventions I got to spend time with the guest actors as regular people - in our hotel room at VOR, Wayne Alexander and Wortham Krimmer stopped by our room to use our bathroom (believe it or not). The room was decorated with a life-size stand-up of Sheridan sporting an Aggememnon hat, two mannequin heads complete with Centauri hairdo, and a bowlful of Snix that I made from the Babylon 5 Cookbook. It was fun to offer "Snix?" to Cartagia's actor - he didn't get the joke, but everyone in the room burst out laughing. The Snix were very yummy, by the way. :-)

At Dragoncon, I had gotten separated from my roommates and was feeling a bit lonely when I ran into Stephen Austin, the actor who played the Pakmara ambassador. He remembered me from a couple of other conventions, mainly because my son was a big Pakmara enthusiast and had a website about them and Steve; he invited me to come and sit with him and Michael Forest ,the actor who played the God Apollo in one of the ST:TOS episodes. We didn't talk much, but it was nice to feel like someone wanted me to be with them. :-) Then, on the patio below the bar, some dancing was going on with bongo players and I decided to wander down to join in. Who else should show up but Rick Biggs and Jason Carter? Rick and Jason both commandeered a bongo and played for the crowd - it was great!

Oh, and how could I forget Shore Leave 23 (in 2001), with Bruce Boxleitner and Jerry Doyle having their own 2-man show? They also spent a lot of time in the hotel's bar where fans could join them, up close and personal, sharing drinks, swapping stories, and inhaling Jerry's cigar smoke (yuck) - but it was worth it!

Now, as for momentoes - I guess there are 3 things I wouldn't part with above all else - the model of an Omega Starfury that a friend lovingly assembled and painted for me as a birthday gift, my B5 comic with autographs from almost everyone on the crew, and a photo I have of a prototype collector's plate with Sheridan on it. It was selling for over $1000 at VORcon, which I couldn't afford, but the dealer let me take a photo of it.

Penny

I haven't collected many Babylon 5 mementos because due to distance and finances, I never got to many conventions. But I do have the entire series on VHS tapes, which I plan to convert to DVDs as soon as my new system is in place. I also have a couple of T-shirts and some autographed pictures. My most enduring memento, however, is my 18-pound black part-Persian cat, Neroon, who will be 6 years old this summer. Although he is impressive in size and appearance, he is about as far from being a warrior as one can get. He is not very bright, but he has perfected the art of gazing adoringly and purring thunderously. He still bangs his head on the window whenever he jumps up onto the cat tree.

Ranger Roja Grande

Other than the DVDs, I really wouldn't part with the tiny Bear-Ba-Lon bear I made for my christmas tree!

I figured I'd try to answer my own question. What item is most special! That is very hard. I look around my office walls and see pictures of me with Jason and Bruce and sketches from Tim Earls and cartoons from Tye Bourdony, a puppet made by a fan for Michael O'Hare from an Atlanta convention; a Valen doll made by a fan in Australia. There is the picture of friends gathered at a convention in New Orleans -- we are all wearing frontier costumes. There is the picture of me on the set of "Objects at Rest" with Jeffrey Willerth and a lot of folks that worked behind-the-scenes at Babylon 5. I have a ton of things at home -- but I guess the most special item -- would be the friendships I've made over the years with the wonderful people associated with Babylon 5. Joe Straczynski brought together a very talented, dedicated group of people for Babylon 5. I was lucky enough to meet most of them -- and share some special moments. That is my most special Babylon 5 item.

Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005
From: Patricia R. Sabir

There are so many: Asimov, Herbert, Niven, Lucas, Kevin J. Anderson, Dan Simmons, JMS…. The list goes on and on. But I think the very most influential was Gene Roddenberry. With Star Trek, Roddenberry opened an entirely new era of science fiction to a much wider audience than books and magazines ever reached, enriching the level of interest in a groundswell that continues to this day. Credit should also go to his wife, Majel Barrett, who has kept his universe alive for over 40 years. All current science fiction owes a HUGE debt to him!

Hey Sandy! I think the best director of SCI FI movies and television are the shows made by Gene Roddenberry! In his day, women, blacks, people with accents and especially a lad with a Russian accent were not seen so much on television. Women were the girlfriends of the hero of the Westerns that dominated the TV screeen. When Roddenberry was directing, Amazon women ruled the planets that men landed on, and the men from Earth worked equally with the Amazons, and both sexes learned something from the other.

African-American's weren't allowed on television.. Then on Star Trek, he wrote and directed a strong racial parody about men from the planet Sharon. The men were of 2 different races, yet they looked the same. The two rivals led the Enterprise to Sharon.. The races on Sharon hated each other so much, they destroyed the planet. The two men hated each other so mucch, they didn't care that their planet was destroyed. Only their hatred survived. Very sad.

The Chinese were too closely associated with Vietnamese, so they did not have any more roles other than "Hop Sing" on the Ponderosa.. Now, Lieutenant Sulu graced the stage with his pointy eyes navagating the ship, thanks to Roddenberry. This is much like Spock's pointy ears being science officer! The pointed ears wer a paarody of Asians.

Russians were the enemy of America until Pavel Chechov entered the stage with his Beatles hair-style and his boyish charm...

People were not very accepting before Roddenberry came to the directors chair. Now we have a much more homogenous society, thanks to Old Gene.

Roddenberry did a lot to change the face of TV. I think Roddenberry was a fan of the Illiad andthe Odyssey, because most ofhis stories were based on the stories of Homer.

In one way or another, most genres have produced great works that fit within that definition [Richard McKenna, the author of the SF/fantasy classic, 'Casey Agonistes', also wrote 'The Sand Pebbles' - which he said was science fiction, though the science was social anthropology].

What do I read? Fabulists like Harlan Ellison, hard SF writers like Peter F. Hamilton, space operas by Doc Smith, Eric Frank Russell, and the like, cyberpunkers like William Gibson and Bruce Stirling, I'm pretty much all over the map.

What do I watch? TV: Lost, Alias, Starhunter [guilty pleasure], Delta State, Dark Oracle, ReGenesis, Stargate [both SG-1 and Atlantis - it's a miracle of open-ended premise that matches 'Dr. Who' as a starting point for infinite adventures], Alienated, Battlestar Galactica.

DVD: Currently working my way through 'Sapphire and Steel' - fabulous series that should have gone longer than six serials over three years.

Captain Average
Superhero SF Aficionado...

Hi Sandy:
Really, Sci-Fi can be defined in a number of ways.

I think it can be defined as a probable and/ or reasonable point of viwe of the future. It can be 50,100 or 200 years ahead.

Just we must see what was the Sci-Fi when Star Trek Original was released (example: Cellphones now versus the communicators in that series and many others examples).

Now I'm not seeing Sci-Fi too much. (I'm waiting the premiere of "Lost" in LatAm and to can see Mira Furlan, our dear Deleen of B-5).

Greetings for you,
Andrès.

Dear Ms. Bruckner,

I have always loved science fiction but I have always been drawn to stories that involve time travel and travel through space. I am an avid Trekker (at least 20-25 years!) have watched Quantum Leap, Time Trax, SG-1, etc. I have also watched "Invisible Man" and other stories that have involved people taking risks for science. I throughly enjoy the genre. It takes me out of the mundane and into a completely different place.

I enjoy your newsletter as well because it keeps me up to date about any and all sci-fi happenings and I like to stay on top of things. Thank you for having this newsletter as well as the question and forum. Keep up the good work!!!!

Sincerely

I'm loving SciFi Friday! The new Battlestar Galactica is terrific! Great story lines: great effects!

StarGate is great as well. My son likes O'Neill and complains there is less of him now. He thinks the show should end when he leaves. In spite of the story lines, it is the chemistry between the SG1 members that makes the series. Introducing new characters will degrade the series unless done carefully. The new characters i see comiong on board in season nine kinda leaves me cold. I'm willing to give them some time, but...

Warreas@computer.net

Date: 2/7/05
From: thafele@mtco.com

Sandy,

I find the new Battlestar Galactica to be..well..in a word: Fantastic! Not since the third and fourth seasons of Babylon 5 have I been this excited about sci-fi television.

From the first episodes of "33" and "Water" I knew that we fans had a hit show on our hands! I find the writing to be top notch, the flow of the episodes to date has been wonderful, the actors make their characters seem so real, and the special effects and the camera work are stunning!

As I said before, BSG has given me the same butterflies I had watching seasons three and four of B5. This show is a hit and may it have a long run.

Tom

Hey Sandy

You bet I love the new BSG. I wish SciFi Friday could be on at different times in the week. Like, BSG on Friday at 8:00. SG-1 on Monday at 8:00 and Atlantic on Wednesday at 8:00.

On Fridays, I like to let loose and go out on the town.

My girlfriend doesn't like to sit in on Friday night and watch sci-fi.

I love the new shows on sci-fi, but my girlfriend comes first.

Bonnie Hammer: Please make it so the shows are not all bunched in at once.

Yours,
Matt Sweet

Because I live in Canada, I'm not getting season eight of 'SG-1', but both 'Atlantis' and 'BSG' are airing here, so I'll weigh in on them.

'Stargate: Atlantis' has been very good in its rookie season. With the exception of the mid-season cliffhanger [which required people to be stupid to make the plot work], it has been thoroughly enjoyable. The cast is strong and has terrific chemistry and the writing [with the exception of the noted two eps] has been better than the 'SG-1' of seasons 5 & 7 [that show was rejuvenated by the addition of Corin Nemec's Jonas Quinn, but lost that creative surge when Daniel Jackson reappeared].

'BSG' has become appointment TV for me. The writing really captures the feel of the fleet's dilemma, and the Cylon/humans are a nifty idea, and are well thought out. Again, the show has a strong cast and the writing plays to their strengths.

I was not one of those fanboy/girl fanatics that got all pissy over casting Starbuck and Boomer as women, though I loved the original series for what it was - a campy, melodaramatic series that used elements of Mormonism to establish a quasi-spiritual, quasi-philosophical action series in space.

The new series, from the pilot mini-series on, is superior in virtually every respect: writing, direction, acting and most logically, effects. The series deals with post-disaster trauma, spirtuality [the Cylons have religion - how cool is that?], political/military dichotomy, freedom fighting vs. terrorism, and many other cool elements.

One of my favourites is the Cylon agent, Boomer - both in her unwitting sleeper agent guise on the Galactica, and her fully aware version on Caprica. As Galactica Boomer begins to suspect she might be a Cylon sleeper, she is faced with a moral and ethical dilemma - Caprica Boomer's attachement to Helo could lead to a similar ethical/moral crisis. This is genuinely fascinating stuff.

So, I don't like BSG, I love it!

Captain Average
Vociferous Superhero...

Ron Moore's re-imagining of Battlestar Galactica sits right up there with JMS's Babylon 5. First-rate story telling, characters who have flaw (which make them three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional) and episodes that build a long story arc (rather than starting at point "A" and ending at point "A"). These are all of the qualities that will make BSG equal to Babylon 5. Bring it on!

Mac

"Out of all of the Sci-fi TV shows in the last 20 years, which 5 female characters are the most heroic and well-played by their actors and why?"

Best:
Mira Furlan as Delenn
Claudia Christian as Susan Ivanova
Pat Tallman as Lyta Alexander

Worst:
Tracey Scoggins as whatever her nme was in Babylon 5
"Beca" on Andromeda

Dear Sandra,

Here are my top females.
Alexandra Bastido from "The Champions" I know its more than 20 years but she was one of the first to spring to mind (did you recieve this show in America?) She was one af 3 agents working for a European intelligence agency called Nemisis. Although the token female she was not the female in trouble she could kick but with the best of them, which was different for show from this time. I do not know if she pre dates Emma Peel from the Avengers but she was among the first strong female leads.

Being a Brit I have to nominate a Dr Who girl.Loise Jameson who played the savage in an animal skin bikini, Leela. Although most of the Doctors assistants were strong characters in their own right they would get into trouble and the Dr would have to get them out. Leela was very different when trouble appeared out would come her hunting knife and she would get the Dr out of trouble. She also had some great one liners "Can I kill him now Dr.? "This changing of the doctors assistants helpt to keep the show fresh and interesting.

Claudia Black "officer Sun from Farscape. It was wonderfull to watch her change from dogmatic soldier. To realising a truth cannot be called a truth unless it is questioned. Her growing love for Crighton and then her dilema when there are two Crightons. Then the fierceness of her fighting to protect her new friends. Her despair when she is pregnant and all alone in the hands of the Scarrens. It takes a great deal to convey all this realistically to an audience and she does it in spades.

Now the hard part. how do you choose between Delenn, Lyta Alexander, and commander Ivanova.

Delen is graceful, warm with an underlying strength that will bow to no one or thing. She had some very long scenes but you were held in rapt attention all the way to the end Althougth Lyta only came in part way through she made a big impression. You could feel her anger when she dicovered what the shadows had done to Kosh. Commander Ivanova what words can you use for this lady. Loyal, humorous,in a Russian kind of way,in a fight I would definately want her on my side.Stunningly attractive.JMS certainly knows how to write stong female roles and these ladies have the ability to make their lines shine like the diamonds that they are.

Worst has to be Councilor Troi from STNG whats bad about her EVERYTHING!!! I think producers only chose her hoping the fans were to busy looking at her cleavage to be bothered about her poor lines and lousy acting.

Dr Helena Russel (Barbera Bain) Space 1999 I think she only got this part because the makers wanted her husband Martin Landau for the lead. The only thing she could do well was pout.

Yours Faithfully
James

My "Top 5" would have to include both Ivanova and Delenn.

Another would be Sam Carter from "Stargate SG-1"... but thanks to that show's writers pushing a totally brain-dead "romance" subplot between Carter and her superior and team leader, Col. O'Neill, she's also been high on my list of "most annoying". When they write her as a competent officer who happens to be female, she's fine. When they push this image of Sam as a love-struck idiot, exemplifying the worst male-chauvinist stereotypes about "why women shouldn't be in the military", and running around a military base in tight black tank-tops like a Lara Croft wanna-be... I just want to slap her. And then there's her "SuperSam" side: like the infamous "Mary Sue" of bad fan-fiction, in some episodes there's no field she doesn't know, no expertise she doesn't have. All this and she's The Hero's "love interest" too? Yep, Mary Sue has joined the SGC, and it's the *pro* writers who're doing the MarySue-ing. Gaah.

--AmyCat

Top 5:

1. Buffy Summers [Sarah Michelle Geller] - She took a kid saddled with a *Destiny* and made her growth believable.
2. Susan Ivanova [Claudia Christian] - She took B5's second-in-command and turned her into one of the most complex and intriguing characters ever seen on TV [in any genre].
3. Major Samantha Carter [Amanda Tapping] - She plays her scientist/warrior with charm, wit, vulnerability and toughness. She also makes us believe that Major Carter is as smart as the show says she is.
4. Joan Girardi [Amber Tamblyn] - Tamblyn's Joan is a real teenager, with all the contradictions and complexity that entails. One gets the feeling that Joan would've been the same person even if God hadn't decided to ask her to do Him occasional favor.
5. Lt. Kara 'Starbuck' Thrace [Katee Sackhoff] - Too much swagger and she'll be accused of ripping off Dirk Benedict; to little and she'll be accused of not being Starbuck. So far, she's managed to walk that line beautifully.

Worst? Too many to choose from...

Captain Average
The Superhero, Exercising A Modicum Of Compassion...

For my money, the 5 best written and acted female sci-fi characters in recent history are from the 2 best sci-fi shows of the last 20 years: Babylon 5 and Firefly.

From B5: Susan Ivanova, Delenn, and Elizabeth Lochley. JMS gave these characters tremendous depth and power, and Claudia, Mira, and Tracy each did a fabulous job in expressing that depth and power in their performance.

From Firefly, Kaylee and River are my current favorites, but depending on where Joss Whedon goes with the forthcoming Serenity movie, Inara might surprise me and outshine them both. Firefly was such an incredible blending of a group of wildly different but interesting characters...they are all notable and so interesting that it's difficult to pick favorites.

On the topic of annoying characters, well, just pick pretty much any character from the Star Trek franchise in the last three series. Starting with DS9: Kira was annoying, period. I mean, compare her to Odo. Odo was a character that was written to be annoying, but Rene played him so *well* that I liked him even though his character was annoying, but Kira...ugh, Kira was supposed to be a strong female character that came off as annoying left and right. Moving on to Voyager, we might as well start with the captain. The character of Janeway was so bad that I hardly know where to begin. That captain not only suffered from a lack of depth, but she seemed to me to be a failed attempt to combine the thoughtfulness of Picard with the fortitude of Kirk. The result in my opinion was a character who was annoyingly inconsistent and thereby uninteresting. Then comes seven of nine...dude, if I wanted to watch Baywatch, I'd just go and watch it, you know? It's as if the networks either think that sci-fi fans don't know about Baywatch (yeah, right) or the only way to get new viewers from among the mundanes is to add that Baywatch element to a show. Well, I guess either it worked or they just won't let go of the idea, but what do we have now but an equally beautiful lady in a skintight suit except now she's not an ex-Borg she a Vulcan...variations on a theme...and starting from the first episode they add gratuitous titillating scenes like her and the engineer rubbing suntan lotion on each other...*sigh* Hey, let's just drop the pretense and for the next Trek series put David Hasselhoff as the Captain of the Enterprise B, and Pamela Anderson as the lifeguard on the rec deck, and run around the galaxy saving aliens from drowning. ;)

Conclusion: annoying, ill-conceived shows breed annoying characters, whether male or female, and great shows give great characters a chance to flourish. There's exceptions to this rule somewhere I'm sure, but at the moment I really can't think of any.

Hello Sandy,
Anyway, here are my responses to your discussion topics of late.

I didn't respond to the question about the worst B5 episode,, so I would say that " Grey 17 is Missing" is certainly one of the weakest ones, even though one of the last lines is a doozy, which is the one said by Marcus to Neroon: " The next time you want to have a revelation, please don't make it quite so uncomfortable." Or words to that effect. Other less then stellar eps probably would be "TKO" and maybe the one mentioned " Grail." Those were some of the less then what JMS usually gave us episodes, and maybe if you include " Exogenesis." also. But,, for the most part, they were really excellent.

As for the best women in Sci-fi,, well, it is very hard to rank them, but I will start with our people first,, of course Mira Furlan as Delenn was superb, she brought strength, sensitivity, sweetness and at times a quiet fire to the role. Claudia Christian's Ivanova was excellent, she was hard on the outside, and you would go into battle with her anyday,, but underneath she was vulnerable and afraid to love, perhaps because of her family sadness. Pat Tallman's Lyta was a part that grew, and I think it was suprising how tough that character would turn out to be. She too brought a lot to the role,, her eyes were more then a window to her soul. These were great parts for women and showed a lot of passion, and strength,,, yet tender too.

Now we come to someone who is, to my mind, well, you can't go wrong,, she is incredible,, and of course I am speaking of Officer Aeryn Sun,, Claudia Black of Farscape,, she was so amazing in that role,, it was made for her. She could kick ass and be tough and strong,, and scare you, and John Crichton,, half to death, and yet, underneath and as we saw, she learned to love Crichton and go to the line for him and the crew of Moya. I am in awe of her talent and she was perfect for the role. And may I also mention filling out the 5 I must name,, Zhann,, the wonderful, most interesting character that Virginia Hey so skillfully played. She is very spiritual and brought that to the part, and also knows her own mind and brought that as well. Too bad she couldn't take the makeup anymore, because that was a wonderful, character,, And I give an honorable mention to Chiana,, a very sexy, gray nymphet, who could battle with the best of them. Gigi Edgely brought a gamin like quality to that role, and was also great.

I know I am only to name 5, but I do want to also recognize what Linda Hamilton brought to Beauty and the Beast, even though I don't think she understood the show, she and Ron Perlman as Vincent really touched your heart with the magic and pathos, and heartbreak that show represented. So sad, poignant and yet beautifully romantic, and without her, well the show wasn't the show.

As for women I didn't like,, well, I can't stand the T'Pol character on Enterprise,, she just leaves me cold, and any of the woman in the Star Drek universe,, ( save Classic Trek). Also,, for the most part the shows I don't watch, are the ones where the characters don't appeal to me. So it is hard to name them all.

So, those are some thoughts off the top of my head, and if I think of more I shall write again,, all the best to all.
Faith manages,
Ranger Connie - the Flamekeeper

Here is my two-cents worth on your discussion topics:

Topic 1: Most Heroic SF female characters: Susan Ivanova (B5), Scully (X-Files)

Topic 2: Most Annoying SF female character: Hands-down it is CAPT "What's her name?" from Voyager Star Trek series; I obviously did not watch it very much due a lot to her annoying voice; that voice can drive a person to suicide.

My personal top 5:
1. Ivanova from B5- Could be fierce as well as jovial, went out with a bang when she almost died in the battle to retake earth. Claudia Christian is both beautiful and an excellent actress who handled the physical demands of the role with grace.
2. Carter from SG-1- Brains, compassion, braun & beauty is a can't beat combo. Amand Tapping's portrayal of a dual Scientist/military officer is difficult enough without having to compete with a male-dominated cast. An absolute pleasure to watch as she helps save the Universe week after week.
3. Buffy from Buffy the Vampire Slayer- Kicked more but than a dozen Hong Kong Kung Fu movies. Michelle Gellar's portrayal of Buffy was both fearless and self-depreciating as she tried to deny her calling. Her comedic talents as she bantered with her sidekicks were a major reason for the longevity of the show.
4. Lyta from B5- Although she didn't become a regular until season 3, Patricia Tallman's Lyta "stole" the spotlight of many of season's 3-5 critical episodes. Her addition as a regular cast member was a stroke of genius and by the end of B5's run she in effect was the most powerful weapon in the galaxy. Her character transformation was played brilliantly as seen in her ability to play her with compassion as well as a ruthless telepath.
5. Max from Dark Angel- Max was beautiful, smart, strong and eventually became a leader. Newcomer Jessica Alba did a great job in making us believe that this genetically engineered soldier could be a killer as well as a lover. Her street portrayal of a superhero was a first for a lead female in a scifi show.

Optional add-on to this: Who are the 2 most annoying female leads in Sc-fi TV in the last 20 years?

1. Nicole de Boer (DAX & Sarah bannerman) for both DS-9 and the Dead Zone. Single-handedly ruined 10 episodes from DS-9 Season 7 and should be killed off ASAP from the Dead Zone.
2. Shiri Appleby - Liz Parker from Roswell. Was killed several times but unfortunately did not stay dead during the run of the series.

With the new year now upon us, let's talk BABYLON 5. What is your least favorite episode-- and why?

Regarding the current discussion topic, which is my least favorite B5 Episode, it has to be "Intersections in Real Time" from season 4. I know that I don't like this episode because I usually skip watching it when I am in need of a B5 fix and start watching the series from start to finish. I don't like it because the entire episode is about the interrogation and torture of Sheridan. It is painful to watch and you don't know if he is hallucinating or if what he is seeing is real. I suppose that this episode was a necessary bridge or transition episode for the coming overthrow of Clark but I just do not enjoy it. There are probably 3-5 fluff episodes which could be runners up to my top choice (TKO, Soul Mates, Exogenesis etc.).

I think my least favorite episode has to be "Grail" from Season 1. The story isn't actually bad, but the actor who played Jinxo did so poorly that the story didn't come across very well, despite David Warner's excellent portrayal of the seeker, Aldous. I think the actor who portrayed Deuce gave a somewhat wanting performance as well...either that or I just couldn't get his Bob Newhart Show persona out of my head long enough to take him seriously...

Anybody else finding it really difficult to think of bad episodes of B5? I mean sure, the Season 5 episodes about Byron's telepaths had their problems, but other than that: man, what a show -- in every respect.

With the news that THE MEMORY OF SHADOWS will go into production in April, what would be your reaction if Peter Woodward was NOT Galen -- and other B5 cast members were replaced by "name" actors?

During my reading of Jeanne Cavellos' Technomage Trilogy some years ago, wishfully thinking I imagined how great a series of movies they would've made. When reading Galen's dialogue, it was Peter Woodward's voice I heard in my head. Peter Woodward defined the role of Galen as written by JMS and others in "Crusade". In his performances, with the wit, charm, vocal delivery and gravitas he gave his character he reminded me of the great Brit character actor, Nicol Williamson. WB is going to have to go to great lengths to find someone who actually has the acting chops to pull off the role, (if they proceed with their recasting of the known B5/Crusade characters) so why not go with the original and save themselves the trouble. Woodward already has enough movie roles in his resume, making him a recognizeable presence to the general public, so Warner Bros premise about about using movie actors to replace TV actors is at best specious and at worst ludicrous. Finally, unless they find an unknown wild card in this process, I seriously doubt they'll attract an 'A' or even a 'B' list actor to do the role, so the choices narrow considerably.

Best, ---= Dennis =--- <*>

Hi Sandy:
How are you?
My opinion is that, each character of B5 and Crusade, after all this time, already be "melted" with the real person, well, I don't believe one or another character be accepted with another face now, Bruce Boxleitner is Captain Sheridan, Mira Furlan is Deleen, Claudia Christian is Ivanova, Jerry Doyle is Garibaldi, Peter Woorward is Galen, etc. Definitely each face is a character.

Your friend,
Andrès

If a part were recast because an actor wasn't available, I could accept the role being recast if it were vital to the story. But to cast a "name" actor just because TV actors don't have the "Star" recognition would be unthinkable! Any such movie would be *sure* to have a major fan backlash and insure the failure of the movie rather than it's success.

To me there is no good reason to recast our favorite characters with "big name" actors. If "big name" actors are needed, just create new characters for them! Bring back our old favorites in their familiar roles! Please! Peter Woodward IS Galen, as far as I'm concerned. If he can't come back to reprise his role, give the character another name. I'll go see the movie no matter who plays which role; still, my preference is to see my favorite actors on the big screen.

That's always a difficult topic. The movie, "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me" featured a different actress in the role of Donna when Lara Flynn Boyle, the actress who portrayed Donna in the TV series, refused to reprise her role. The recasting was a disservice to both actresses as well as the character & the fans of the show, but was, unfortunately, unavoidable.

Peter Woodward made such an indelible impression as Galen that it would be very difficult to imagine anyone else in the role, as well as very disappointing should he not return / be allowed to return in favour of a "name" actor. The same can be said about every other B5 / Crusade character.

It's understandable that actors don't always have the time (or desire) to reprise roles, but if it's a situation of Hollywood "playing it safe", then it's an insult to the actors & the film.

I'm not saying I wouldn't go see "B5:TMoS" if roles were recast ('cos, hey... c'mon -- it's JOE!), but it wouldn't really bode well for the movie in terms of fan reception.

Just my 2p.

Date: 12/8/2004 6:25 PM
From: Tkbab5@aol.com

LOST.
This show got off to a great start. If you haven't seen it yet, I highly recommend catching it. If you can, watch the pilot first and then as many episodes as you can back-to-back (TIVO is really helpful here.)

That said, I am really starting to think that someone at the LOST production office (J.J. Abrams, the creator of Alias, and/or Damon Lindelof ) is a big Babylon 5 fan as evidenced by the following:

1. Casting Daniel Dae Kim as one of the lead actors.
2. A "Who are you?" theme that has spilled over more than one episode.
3. Casting Mira Furlan as the first "main" guest star. If you watch the show already, you know that her character may have a HUGE impact on the overall story arc.
4. The attention to detail. This is something missing from TV since Babylon 5. There is nothing wasted here. In fact, watch the pilot again, and you'll be able pick out things which come up throughout the later episodes. For example, the first time we see Kate she's holding her wrist... it's only for a second or two, but it has a special meaning as we find out in a later episode.

I'm know there are more B5 ties, I just can't think of them off the top of my head.

In terms of what's been filling my time on TV, I started watching Andromeda back in March (when SciFi added it to their schedule). I also started seeing it in syndication (most recently on Superstation WGN).

Needless to say, I was hooked... and not just because Kevin Sorbo is still a good looking man. I could identify with his character, Dylan Hunt, as someone who had lost everything that was dear to him and was willing to make the best of the situation given to him. I also loved his sense of humor, conviction, hope & optimism. I also liked the show's action, humor and occasional intrigue... plus composer Matthew McCarthy's score.

As for Enterprise, we don't get to see it in prime time as our local area (Gainesville, FL) doesn't have a true UPN affiliate; usually at 1:30 am ET on Saturday or Monday mornings. Starting December 1, we will have a full-time UPN affiliate so I'm hoping the situation will change.

Actually I prefer Enterprise to any of the others. I also watch Andromeda and occasionally Star Gate.

I find myself watching far less TV these days (well, some football on weekends). There isn't a whole lot worth watching.

But CSI, so far, is still VERY good. ihmo. It seems like Bruckheimer is either trying to compete with Dick Wolfe (He of the "Law and Order" franchise-to-death), or kill the golden goose. The original is still the best; I enjoy the character interactions (hey - isn't that what a lot of us liked about B5?), and the plot twists. And we can see the characters change and grow (or not...)

However, lest anyone think I've become mundane in my dotage, "Lost" has kind of caught me. And now that Mira has put in an appearance (and sounds like she'll be a semi-regular) I watch it to see what weirdness will pop up next. Tell you the truth, I'm not even sure they're alive. I've noticed that the characters are not nearly as stereotypical as when the show started. Some of them even seem to be fleshing out a bit. As long as it doesn't go TOO off-the-wall, I think this one could be quite good.

That said, I did watch (and record) "Farscape: The Peacekeeper Wars". Though it was really hurried in spots, on the whole I really liked it. And the ending still leaves open the possibility of continuing in some future time, whether it might be more miniseries, some TV movies, that sort of thing.

Other than that, I find myself watching far less TV these days...

I can't believe it! I hated Enterprise for the first 3 seasons. It was a poor, lame imitation of Star Trek. Then enter: Manny Coto. First, he cleverly winds his way out of the incredibly stupid season three ender. Not only that, but he uses this episode to get rid of the oft' maligned "Temperal Cold War" thread. It's gone, folks... yeah! Then he tops himself by making a tripartate story arc starting Brent Spiner as an ancestor of Dr. Noonian Soong, Data's creator. And this wasn't just some stupid excuse to bring in a big name Star Trek actor. It deeped the story about the "augments," those genetically altered "relatives" of Khan, whilst deepening the understanding of where Dr. N. Soong got his brains and drive to create Data.

Next enter the Vulcan trilogy, written by Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens the authors that have written some mighty awesome Star Trek novels in nearly every genre. This trilogy is going to clear up the mess that Brandon and Braga made of the Vulcans by making them so devious and emotional that we couldn't recognize them. This trilogy just started last week and it looks to be a marvelous story.

Not only has Manny Coto (no relation to Vir *grin*) begun taking fan's advise and started working within the known Star Trek universe, with known Star Trek history, but he is also making sure that the characters are three- demensional, the plots have continuity within themselves and within the Star Trek universe, the writing is geared towards the known intelligence of Star Trek fans, and, while every episode is tied to known Trek mythology, the story ideas are crisp and original.

Hooray for Star Trek! It's gotten so good now that I am actually anxiously awaiting each new episode. I would recommend every Star Trek fan, new or old, tune in again and start watching. It'll be worth your time, I promise.

Alternatively, in your opinion which three shows during the same period lasted way too long and never should have made it past their 1st season? Why should these 3 overrated TV shows should have expired ASAP?

Underrated:
Earth 2
Firefly
Space Above and Beyond

Overrated
ST Voyager!!!
Voyager
Voyager!!!!
(If it can be counted three times, all the better!

Hi